Twice upon one time, there were two
squirrels in the same wood, one of them in perpetual harvesting motion, wise
and industrious, gleaning seeds and bugs and litter and nuts, while the other
did not, enjoying instead the one season of good weather. Each of them indulged
his situation, the one in fretful, even desperate endeavor, busy-busy
to-and-fro-ing, the other in timely and sensible pleasure. (You think you know
where this is going?”)
What a heaped-up harvest the good
squirrel made, while the prodigal lay back on piney boughs in the shade of
upper branches for noon nap breaks from his escapades. There were moments when
the stirring one, worn to a frazzle, envied the other but could not condone
either the laziness or fits of razzle dazzle. He collected mushrooms and dried
them neatly on covert twigs, then stored them out of reach. The profligate ate
a fading peach, not feeling the need of conscientious greed. He scampered and
played all over the place, especially on one high tension cable, running back
and forth in a daring race to improve his speeds (how his cousin yearned to
follow his lead!) going faster and faster just to be able to better the records
that he had made.
The hard-working cousin filled many
caches with morels and nuts and assorted grubs, all against imminent winter,
while the frolicker believed there’d always be provender, if only in left-over
cones and nubs, and he continued his spectacular high-flown dashes, summer and
fall, without misgivings for the future at all, the playboy of the Rocky
Mountains, aerial cavalier who winked away fears of on-coming winter.
But winter came on, bitter cold,
glitter icy. Pine cones froze stiff on crystal boughs or were buried under
drifts of high-piled snow. The dutiful one was doing nicely, but the wastrel
was wasting, desperate to plunder, hell-bent to forage. But there was, of
course, not a pittance to be found in trees or on ground, wherever he
scampered. His front teeth had grown over-long, his mouth was sizing up, he was
starving both for food and courage. Now, as his life was ending, when there was
not even an occasional antler bone, he was prepared to die—but alone, apart
from others, from all the precepts and clichés hurled down from heights: “You
should have been (yes) squirreling things away” against a rainy or freezing
day. Or: “Those who romp and play will pay today for yesterday.” And the worst
of slogans—“The more you shirk the more you’ll work”—would be truer than the
rest.
And, then, what could be dumber than
stumbling just at that time on his cousin’s storehouse, lying in secret ground,
so many treasures cleverly covered by molted feathers of native jackdaws with
him unable to eat a single nub or nut, since he couldn’t open his sealed locked
jaws. He reeled and whirled a final spin and expired on the spot, as much from
chagrin as not.
And the sensible one? He was racing
across that same high wire his cousin had used, feeling safe, Spring-exultant,
healthy, exuberant, vindicant, doing what, at last, he truly and enviously
wanted—making new records, becoming legend, lore, before a fantasied audience
stirred up to applause. But, stepping on frayed winter-worn insulation with
dew-wet paws, he went into instant and terminal shock, and fell straight down,
dead as a rock.
Moral: The worst thing about traitorous Fate, in its many and inspired
distributions, the thing, deep down, that we really hate—is our own
contribution.
No comments:
Post a Comment